$0.00
+0.00%
Operator · Operator
Alex Khan
Thank you. Earlier today Absci released financial and operating results for the quarter ended March 31 2024. If you haven’t received this news release or if you'd like to be added to the Company's distribution list, please send an email to investors.absi.com. An archived webcast of this call will be available for replay on Absci’s Investor Relations website at investors.absci.com for at least 90 days after this call.
Joining me today are Sean McClain, Absci’s Founder and CEO; and Zach Jonasson, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Business Officer, Christian Stegmann, Absci's SVP of Drug Creation will also join for Q&A following prepared remarks. Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that management will make statements during this call that are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Federal Securities laws. These statements involve material risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or events to materially differ from those anticipated and you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
Additional information regarding these risks, uncertainties and factors that could cause results to differ appears in the section entitled “Forward-looking Statements” in the press release Absci issued today and the documents and reports filed by Absci from time-to-time with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Except as required by law, Absci disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any financial or product pipeline projections or other forward-looking statements either because of new information, future events, or otherwise. This conference call contains time-sensitive information and is accurate only as of the live broadcast May 14, 2024. With that, I will turn the call over to Sean.
Sean McClain · Operator
Zach Jonasson
Thanks Sean. As Sean discussed, this past quarter we closed an underwritten public offering of common stock raising gross proceeds of approximately 86.4 million. This additional capital will further support our ability to advance our internal pipeline of asset programs. This strategy reflects the hybrid business model that we introduced last year wherein we intend to develop our internal programs to a certain value to certain value inflection points, for example, through a Phase 1 or potentially Phase 2 clinical trial, before selling, partnering, or out-licensing set asset.
A primary rationale for our strategies stems from our platform’s ability to create differentiated antibody drug candidates in a highly efficient manner. We believe our strategy will allow us to create and capture more of the overall value of these internally generated programs. As we have said in the past, every program is unique and there is no one size fits all strategy for these assets. As the best practice and guidance strategy, we will look for the right partner at the right time.
As Sean mentioned earlier, we generated the ABS-101 candidate in just 14 months at a cost of less than $5 million. By comparison, pharma industry estimates we have seen pin such figures at three plus years to reach a drug candidate and at a cost of $30 million to $50 million and as our platform continues to improve via our data generation and screening cycles, we believe over time, that we will even further reduce the time it takes us to generate additional drug candidates. Turning back to our current internal program pipeline.
Our lead program ABS-101 is a potential best-in-class anti-TL1A antibody. In January, we presented early preclinical data from three advanced leads from this program. This data showed properties consistent with a potentially superior product profile, including demonstrated high affinity, high potency, favorable developability and extended half life. We used our de novo AI model to design ABS-101 leads towards a specific epitope of TL1A with the objective of creating a drug candidate with superior potency and lower immunogenicity.
This target product profile, combined with anticipated high bioavailability could ultimately improve patient experience with easier, less frequent dosing. Following further confirmatory PK studies. In February, we selected a primary and a backup development candidate to advance into IND-enabling studies. We also recently completed studies demonstrating ABS-101 candidate’s ability to bind both the TL1A monomer and trimer, which could potentially lead to differentiated clinical efficacy.
We plan to share additional preclinical data, including data from non-human primate studies in the next few months. We then expect to initiate Phase 1 clinical studies in early 2025 with an interim data readout expected in the second half of 2025. Next, ABS-201, a potentially best-in-class antibody for an undisclosed dermatology target is designed for an undisclosed dermatological indication with significant unmet need where the efficacy for the pharmacological standard-of-care is not satisfactory.
We anticipate selecting the development candidate for this program in the second half of 2024. Finally, ABS-301, a potentially first-in-class antibody for an undisclosed immuno-oncology target is a fully human antibody designed to bind to a novel target discovered through our reverse immunology platform. This antibody inhibits an immunosuppressive cytokine and is believed to stimulate an innate immune response. ABS-301 is being evaluated for broad applicability to a variety of oncology indications and comprehensive profiling of this program is in progress.
We anticipate completion of the mode of action validation studies for this program in the second half of 2024. As a reminder, our reverse immunology platform is designed to discover novel antibody targets, based on the analysis of Tertiary Lymphoid Structures or TLS from patient samples. Within this platform, we mine the antibody repertoires from the TLS samples derived from patients who have exhibited an extraordinary immune response.
We discovered the ABS-301 novel human antibody and its corresponding target using this platform. We look forward to sharing additional details later this year. In addition to further development of ABS-101, ABS-201 and ABS-301, we continue to expect to advance at least one additional internal asset program to a lead stage in 2024. Further, in line with our hybrid business model, we continue to execute and make solid progress on our existing drug creation partnerships.
I am pleased to see the close collaboration between our partners and our own R&D teams. And while we cannot disclose much detail about our partners’ programs, the work we are doing with these partners is progressing well and according to our expected timelines. We look forward to sharing more details about these programs at a later date. Additionally, we continue to anticipate finding additional drug creation partnerships with at least four partners in 2024 including one or more multi-program partnerships.
I am also pleased to share that we have a robust and diverse pipeline of potential partners and we look forward to updating you on these over the course of the year. Turning now to our financials, revenue in the first quarter of 2024 was $900,000 as we continue to progress our partnered an internal programs concurrently. Research and development expenses in the first quarter of 2024 were 12.2 million, as compared to $12.7 million in the prior year period.
This decrease was primarily driven by lower personnel cost, offset by an increase in stock compensation expense. Selling, general and administrative expenses were $8.7 million in the first quarter of 2024, as compared to $9.6 million in the prior year period. This decrease was due to a lower personnel cost and continued reduction in administrative costs, offset by an increase in stock compensation expense. Turning to our balance sheet, we ended the quarter with $161.5 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments as compared to $97.7 million as of December 31st 2023.
For 2024, we continue to expect a gross use of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of approximately $80 million, inclusive of the expected costs associated with completing the IND-enabling studies for ABS-101 with a third-party CRO. Based on our current plans, we believe our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments will be sufficient to fund our operations into the first half of 2027. Altogether, we are very encouraged by the progress we have made on our internal programs and confident in our ability to execute on these and our partnered programs over the course of 2024. With that, I'll turn it back to Sean.
Questions & answers
Sean McClain · Operator
Kripa Devarakonda
Q1
Hey guys. Thank you so much for taking my question. I have a question about ABS-101. We recently saw exciting preclinical data from the program. I was just wondering if you can talk about your level of confidence that this drug is differentiated versus the other drugs in the same class. Do you - do we truly understand the biology about the importance of targeting monomer versus trimer and what sort of an edge do you have in understanding that part of it? And then I have a follow-up question.
Sean McClain · Operator
Christian Stegmann
Q2
Yeah, thank you, Sean. Absolutely. First off, we do think that our extended half-life is an absolutely critical and very differentiated parameter that will address patient convenience topics. But more importantly also on the monomer trimer question, I think it's important to highlight that our AI guided antibody design strategy is really based on epitope-specific targeting using 3D structures and specifically for 3D structures of TL1A.
So we selectively chose an epitope on the monomer that shows no discrimination for monomer versus trimer binding and we designed antibodies using AI. So we completely avoid epitopes that's span multiple sub-units. And this allowed us to produce a development candidate that equally targets both TL1A states and it also addresses to our knowledge, all known monomer isoforms. This may have relevance in clinical trials, because it's known that certain monomers are expressed differentially in a certain patient populations.
Kripa Devarakonda
Q2
Great. Thank you so much. Sean, I have a question for you, a big bigger picture question. You were talking about using Generative AI models. I was just wondering with the improved Generative AI models and new data, do you think you can continue to improve efficiency and reduce the drug development timelines? I know, 14 months is already great and $5 million to develop a drug is already great, but just wondering about that. Thank you.
Sean McClain · Operator
Kripa Devarakonda
Q3
Great. Thank you so much.
Operator · Operator
George Farmer
Q4
Hi, good morning, everyone. Thanks for taking my question. I was wondering if you could give us a heads up on what we can expect to see from the non-human primate studies ongoing with ABS-101 later this year.
Sean McClain · Operator
Christian Stegmann
Q5
Yeah, absolutely. So our non-human primate pharmacokinetic studies are expected to demonstrate that we indeed are able to show an extended half-life of our antibody that’s de-risking the pharmacokinetic profile in humans. So we, in the next few months we will be able to demonstrate that our antibody engineering approach to extend the half-life of the antibody have worked.
George Farmer
Q5
Okay. Anything else from those studies we should be looking out for the PD markers, anything like that that can kind of shed light on the differentiation of the antibody from competitors?
Christian Stegmann
Q5
Yes, we will absolutely measure the non-pharmacodynamic market, as well, obviously, and exactly as you mentioned, it’s demonstrating an extended effect on the pharmacodynamic biomarker will then obviously also de-risk efficacies, Very good point.
George Farmer
Q5
Okay. Great. And then, maybe a bit on cash. Your guidance implies, I think some funding coming in probably from partnerships is probably the best guess. Can you kind of elaborate a little bit more on that relative to how we should think about cash usage through 2027?
Zach Jonasson
Yeah, we do see.
Sean McClain · Operator
Zach Jonasson
Yeah, I was going to say, George, we continue to reiterate our guidance of $80 million of gross cash usage for 2024. That's obviously a gross figure and that includes the complete the cost associated with completing the IND-enabling studies for ABS-101. Are forecasts that take within to 2027 includes some modest assumptions around partnering on a regular cadence. But it doesn't include any assumptions around a significant partnership deal.
So it's to kind of our typical run rate assumptions built into that. And then, I would point out too, if you look at our net cash usages, that typically comes in well under gross. So, for example, if you look at H2 of 2023, the net cash usage for that second half of last year was roughly $27 million in total. And the net cash usage for Q1 of this year was roughly $15.9 million, which is a little higher given that we paid bonuses in March. So as can see our net cash usage is coming well in - coming well under the gross cash usage.
George Farmer
Q5
Yeah, okay. Thanks very much, Zach.
Operator · Operator
Jacqueline Kisa
Q6
Hi, this is Jacqueline Kisa on for Steven Mah. Thanks so much for taking the question. With the ongoing bipartisan discussions regarding biosecurity, can you give us any color on the third party CRO you're using for your IND studies? Is it WuXi Biologics or a China-based CRO?
Sean McClain · Operator
Jacqueline Kisa
Q7
Great. Thank you. I appreciate the color. And regarding your fourth internal asset, can you give us any insight on the disease area you're looking to focus on? Is it one you've targeted before or new therapeutic area? And is the company right-sized to serve both your internal and partnered programs?
Sean McClain · Operator
Jacqueline Kisa
Q8
Great. Thank you. And then, if I could just squeeze one more in? Technologies in the AI drug discovery are pretty fragmented. Are there any white spaces in the tech stack that you could fill inorganically? Or do you expect to build on your tech in-house?
Sean McClain · Operator
Jacqueline Kisa
Q9
Great. Thank you so much. I appreciate it.
Operator · Operator
Steve Dechert
Q10
Hey guys. Thanks for the question. Could you give us some more color on how discussions are going with potential partners? Is there a wait to get into your goal of four partners this year?
Christian Stegmann
Q10
Yeah, I can comment on that, Sean. I'd say well, signing partnerships is always a little bit lumpy and if you look at our cadence last year, it's hard to have them come out on a even cadence throughout the year. But I would say that our pipeline of discussions is robust and covers both large pharma, and mid and small biotech, as well as leading academic institutions. And as we have these discussions and prosecute the BD strategy, we're really looking for partners who bring a strong synergy to the table.
And typically that means really robust and deep knowledge of the target biology. That's where we see a really fertile ground for partnering. So, I would say, we feel like we're well on track to hitting the metrics that you mentioned.
Steve Dechert
Q10
Okay. Thanks. And then, are there any new capabilities that you're investing in, as it relates to your platform? Thanks.
Sean McClain · Operator
Operator · Operator
Li Chen
Q11
Hello. Good morning. This is Li Chen. Can you hear me well?
Sean McClain · Operator
Li Chen
Q12
Hi, I have two questions. One is to expand on previous discussions on the upsize differentiation. So, since the release of the 101 data, have you seen any shifts in the nature of the inbound partnerships or partner interests? What I mean is that you said that previous partnerships were primarily driven by the epitope-specific antibody design. So, anything - any other capabilities that your partner is interested with primary focus on antibody design? And I have another question around 201.
Sean McClain · Operator
Zach Jonasson
Yeah, we have had a lot of medics inbound interest around that asset and continue to have discussions. Our strategy as Sean illustrated earlier is to move that asset forward into Phase 1 clinical studies. But we're certainly entertaining discussions now and happy to see the interest from potential partners in that area. And the second part of your question, I'll just mention, I think this epitope specificity it’s been really intriguing to potential partners.
So, highlighting the capabilities of our platform and designing that asset I think has been quite been interesting to a number of potential partners and existing partners as well as our ability to design in unique features. So in some of our other assets and case studies, we've shown an ability to design in pH-dependent binding multi band with the unique properties that can be differentiating in a clinical setting. So I think that's an exciting area for us.
Li Chen
Q12
Great. Thank you very much. And my second question is on 201. Can you give us some color on the current competitive landscape of 201 in that undisclosed disease area? And what’s your confidence of the differentiation factors from the current SOC and pipeline drugs? Thank you.
Sean McClain · Operator
Christian Stegmann
Q13
Yes. Thank you. My audio was cutting off from and so your question around ABS-201?
Li Chen
Q13
Yes. 201 around the competitive landscape and differentiation factors.
Christian Stegmann
Q13
Yes. So, we have not disclosed the precise indication for ABS-201 yet. But I will share that this is an indication of high unmet medical needs where this current standard-of-care is unsatisfactory. And we also plan to employ extended half-life antibody technology to basically improve patient convenience, as well just like this for ABS-101. And so, in essence, we will deliver a best-in-class profile, not only from an efficacy standpoint platform, also from a patient convenience standpoint.
Sean McClain · Operator
Li Chen
Q14
Great. Thank you very much.
Operator · Operator
Asset | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brokerage services in your region are provided through Trek Brokerage Services Limited, a company licensed by the Anjouan Offshore Finance Authority, acting as Intermediary Broker pursuant to the Backpack Securities Brokerage Services Terms of Service. Please see our Brokerage Services Terms and Conditions available here. Investing in stocks involves risks, including the total loss of your investment. The value of investments can go down as well as up, and past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. You should consider seeking independent financial or legal advice before making any investment decision. It is your responsibility to ensure that your use of this platform and any investments made comply with the laws and regulations of your jurisdiction.